I am so fed up with advice from people telling women that if they just make the right personal choices at the right time in the right order then there is no problem fitting career, marriage, and kids into our lives.
That’s a load of crap. If anyone had been able to figure out a way to PLAN her way through this worklife mess it would have been me.
Let me just take one example of this kind of advice – Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg tells women in commencement addresses and TED talks:
The implication is that as long as you marry the right guy you’ll be fine, and if you aren’t fine, well, you made the wrong choice. Too bad.
My “awesome husband” David and I were married seven years before our daughter was born. While I don’t believe we thought of it as a “career choice” we certainly married because we shared a vision of our future together. And for seven years we shared household chores and generally tackled life together, as “real partners.” We always assumed we’d both have careers when we had kids, and that we’d share parenting “50/50.”
Then within a few short months of our daughter’s birth, our lives turned into something more like a 1950’s Leave it to Beaver episode.
Five days after our daughter was born, my husband had to go back to 70 hour workweeks or risk losing his annual bonus. The firm had no process for dealing with paternity leave in the bonus structure. So he didn’t take any.
As a matter of pure survival and sanity since I was the only one in the house, I became acutely attuned to baby Kate. How to get her to sleep, how much she would eat, how long we could be out of the house before the next nap. Each time Kate cried at night, I dragged myself out of bed so David could be fresh for work the next day. With David gone 10-12 hours a day, I soon became the more practiced parent and the default person for laundry and cooking and cleaning too.
I prepared to return to work after 12 weeks. During my pregnancy, my proposal to go half-time in a job I’d had for years had been turned down because the budget structure only allowed my manager a specific number of full-time employees. I had resigned from that job and happily taken a new job at a company that offered me the opportunity to work half time for a while after our daughter was born.
The day I returned from maternity leave to my new job, I was laid off.
So three months into “the worklife plan” that said we would both continue our careers and share parenting 50/50, instead we found ourselves in the 1950’s and became June and Ward Cleaver.
With no immediate options for him to work less and me to work more so we could also share more parenting, our vicious cycle continued. Me doing everything at home. Him working nonstop. And the two of us fighting in the kitchen over whose fault this all was.
The problem was not that I failed to choose “an awesome husband.” I had one of those.
The problem was our well-laid 21st century plans and choices had run into a rigid 1950’s workplace paradigm, which then thrust us into a vicious cycle of taking on traditional 1950’s roles at home that we had never intended.
All of this advice that implies women can simply plan and choose our way through today’s worklife challenges – marry the right guy, don’t lean back, choose a family friendly career, have kids early, have kids late, freeze your eggs, just ask for flexibility– actually prevents us from taking effective actions.
If I think I planned wrong and chose the wrong guy, there’s not much I can do about that but blame myself – and him. And listen to advice we know is absurd on some level.
If instead I know that the 1950’s paradigm itself and the vicious cycle we fell into are the problems, those my husband and I can tackle together. And you can too.
So invite me to your next commencement address instead. I’ll bring my “awesome husband” along and you can listen to us share how it was the choice we made after we got married, the choice to dismantle that 1950’s paradigm, that played a huge part in our worklife success.
- Next time you hear a version of this advice, step back and unpack the assumptions underneath. Is it based on 1950’s or 21st century assumptions about men, women and work? How does it make you feel? Does it make you feel inadequate or anxious to have the “right plan?” Or does it make you feel like you can figure out the right action to take at any juncture because you know how to look for the real issues?
- Alternatively, next time you hear a version of this “plan and choose your way through it” advice, you could just stick your fingers in your ears, close your eyes and “La la la la la la la, I’m not listening!”
- If you liked this post, you might enjoy these as well.
- still a ways to go to respect caregiving as valuable apart from gender roles https://t.co/4xpEH3O8jG about 7 hours ago from Hootsuite ReplyRetweetFavorite
- Women across globe will suffer and die "Trump Thinks This Is Pro-Life?" @nytimes https://t.co/qIvXwwINgo about 7 hours ago from Twitter for iPhone ReplyRetweetFavorite
- News flash to @nytimes @rweingarten @SenSanders @TomPerez Reproductive rights are not "identity politics" https://t.co/D9jTpKEHRQ about 1 day ago from Hootsuite ReplyRetweetFavorite
- RT @PPact: We #MarchForScience because lawmakers must protect access to evidence-based sex health programs. https://t.co/M7oUf8jjTH about 1 day ago from Twitter for iPhone ReplyRetweetFavorite
- RT @CecileRichards: .@TomPerez Access to #reprohealth has been an enormous driver of women's economic empowerment. We must fight for it. about 1 day ago from Hootsuite ReplyRetweetFavorite
- Bernie, There Will Be No Revolution Without Reproductive Rights @Rewire_News https://t.co/uZSziMQdpR about 1 day ago from Twitter Web Client ReplyRetweetFavorite
- We won't stop fighting for patients & health centers. Add your name to fight with us! https://t.co/4oeJ87Pwod #StandwithPP #CA about 2 days ago from Twitter Web Client ReplyRetweetFavorite
Remodeling Motherhood offers fresh perspective on mothers, fathers, money, marriage and work paired with tools to remodel and improve the lives of parents and families.