Hybrid Moms: The sides in the “mommy wars” don’t exist
I recently conducted a webinar for Mothers & More on the 6 Biggest Money Mistakes Mothers Make, and I wanted to share my answer to a participant question because it so neatly ties to the also recent – and recurring – media flare up about the “mommy wars” and “SAHM’s” and “working mothers.”
Q: Is it correct to assume that, as with your example, most women are neither a SAHM or a full time working for pay throughout life? We seem like hybrids while everyone is trying – especially the media – to put us into a box.
A. Yes! Excellent observation!
Mothers are usually described as either “stay at home” or “working mom” – both of which are terms I hate. I prefer “mothers who are employed” and “mothers who are not employed.” (Read why here.) Our employment patterns are far more complex.
If I had a backyard barbecue for twenty couples and their kids (and we actually do this regularly) here’s how the twenty mothers and twenty fathers would likely be employed. Of the fathers, eighteen would be employed full-time, more than thirty-five hours a week. Just one would be employed part-time, and one wouldn’t be employed. Of the mothers, only ten would be employed full-time, four part-time, and six wouldn’t be employed at all. And of the ones employed full-time? Only one would be working extensive overtime – 50+ hours a week – which most of us think as the REAL full-time schedule.
If I invited the same group back again five years later, the mothers would be much more likely to have shifted their employment up or down in response to additional children or the ages of their children. The mothers would be much more likely to have left the workforce for family reasons.
Rare is the mother who is never employed when her kids are 0 to 18, and rare is the mother who has never altered her employment when her kids are 0 to 18. Thus, making the sides in the media’s “mommy war” virtually non existent.
Catalyze!: Avoid using the terms “SAHM” and “working mom” yourself. See alternatives in this post.
- still a ways to go to respect caregiving as valuable apart from gender roles https://t.co/4xpEH3O8jG about 7 hours ago from Hootsuite ReplyRetweetFavorite
- Women across globe will suffer and die "Trump Thinks This Is Pro-Life?" @nytimes https://t.co/qIvXwwINgo about 7 hours ago from Twitter for iPhone ReplyRetweetFavorite
- News flash to @nytimes @rweingarten @SenSanders @TomPerez Reproductive rights are not "identity politics" https://t.co/D9jTpKEHRQ about 1 day ago from Hootsuite ReplyRetweetFavorite
- RT @PPact: We #MarchForScience because lawmakers must protect access to evidence-based sex health programs. https://t.co/M7oUf8jjTH about 1 day ago from Twitter for iPhone ReplyRetweetFavorite
- RT @CecileRichards: .@TomPerez Access to #reprohealth has been an enormous driver of women's economic empowerment. We must fight for it. about 1 day ago from Hootsuite ReplyRetweetFavorite
- Bernie, There Will Be No Revolution Without Reproductive Rights @Rewire_News https://t.co/uZSziMQdpR about 1 day ago from Twitter Web Client ReplyRetweetFavorite
- We won't stop fighting for patients & health centers. Add your name to fight with us! https://t.co/4oeJ87Pwod #StandwithPP #CA about 2 days ago from Twitter Web Client ReplyRetweetFavorite
Remodeling Motherhood offers fresh perspective on mothers, fathers, money, marriage and work paired with tools to remodel and improve the lives of parents and families.