Hybrid Moms: The sides in the “mommy wars” don’t exist
I recently conducted a webinar for Mothers & More on the 6 Biggest Money Mistakes Mothers Make, and I wanted to share my answer to a participant question because it so neatly ties to the also recent – and recurring – media flare up about the “mommy wars” and “SAHM’s” and “working mothers.”
Q: Is it correct to assume that, as with your example, most women are neither a SAHM or a full time working for pay throughout life? We seem like hybrids while everyone is trying – especially the media – to put us into a box.
A. Yes! Excellent observation!
Mothers are usually described as either “stay at home” or “working mom” – both of which are terms I hate. I prefer “mothers who are employed” and “mothers who are not employed.” (Read why here.) Our employment patterns are far more complex.
If I had a backyard barbecue for twenty couples and their kids (and we actually do this regularly) here’s how the twenty mothers and twenty fathers would likely be employed. Of the fathers, eighteen would be employed full-time, more than thirty-five hours a week. Just one would be employed part-time, and one wouldn’t be employed. Of the mothers, only ten would be employed full-time, four part-time, and six wouldn’t be employed at all. And of the ones employed full-time? Only one would be working extensive overtime – 50+ hours a week – which most of us think as the REAL full-time schedule.
If I invited the same group back again five years later, the mothers would be much more likely to have shifted their employment up or down in response to additional children or the ages of their children. The mothers would be much more likely to have left the workforce for family reasons.
Rare is the mother who is never employed when her kids are 0 to 18, and rare is the mother who has never altered her employment when her kids are 0 to 18. Thus, making the sides in the media’s “mommy war” virtually non existent.
Catalyze!: Avoid using the terms “SAHM” and “working mom” yourself. See alternatives in this post.
- @TaliOsteen @davequast @ussoccer Agreed. Part of prob is @ussoccer handle doesn't have to read USMensSoccer. It's assumed. about 5 days ago from Twitter Web Client in reply to TaliOsteen ReplyRetweetFavorite
- @davequast YUP about 5 days ago from Hootsuite in reply to davequast ReplyRetweetFavorite
- RT @KatieHill4CA: This is the story about the time I face a difficult choice... OUR VOICE. OUR CHOICE. https://t.co/6eIbitJt5B about 6 days ago from Twitter Web Client ReplyRetweetFavorite
- Female lawmakers, staffers and lobbyists speak out on 'pervasive' harassment in California's Capitol @latimes https://t.co/FSh4gB78qz about 6 days ago from Twitter for iPhone ReplyRetweetFavorite
- RT @MartysaurusRex: @nflcommish really bruh? It's hard trying to play both sides of the fence when it comes down to injustice and your mone… about 1 week ago from Twitter Web Client ReplyRetweetFavorite
- RT @Schriock1: This choice sends the wrong message. We've reached out to the @womensmarch organizers to share our disappointment and offer… about 1 week ago from Twitter for iPhone ReplyRetweetFavorite
- Of course it was, this stuff is always an open secret. Weinstein Company Was Aware of Payoffs in 2015 via @NYTimes https://t.co/ujOpdYeiXh about 1 week ago from Twitter for iPhone ReplyRetweetFavorite
Remodeling Motherhood offers fresh perspective on mothers, fathers, money, marriage and work paired with tools to remodel and improve the lives of parents and families.